Newtonian Gravity Concept Inventory (NGCI)

Developed by Kathryn Williamson and Shannon Willoboughby

Purpose To assess introductory general education college astronomy (“Astro 101”) students’ understanding of Newtonian gravity.
Format Pre/post, Multiple-choice
Duration 20 min
Focus Astronomy Content knowledge (directionality of gravity, force law, thresholds related to gravity, independence of forces)
Level Intro college
Login or Register to Download Downloads are restricted to high school and college faculty.

Sample questions from the NGCI:

NGCI Implementation and Troubleshooting Guide

Everything you need to know about implementing the NGCI in your class.

Login or register to download the implementation guide.

K. Williamson, S. Willoughby, and E. Prather, Development of the Newtonian Gravity Concept Inventory, Astron. Educ. Rev. 12 (1), 1 (2013).
RESEARCH VALIDATION
more details
Silver Validation
This is the second highest level of research validation, corresponding to at least 5 of the validation categories below.

Research Validation Summary

Based on Research Into:

  • Student thinking

Studied Using:

  • Student interviews
  • Expert review
  • Appropriate statistical analysis

Research Conducted:

  • At multiple institutions
  • By multiple research groups
  • Peer-reviewed publication

The multiple-choice questions on the NGCI were developed based on previous research on student ideas about gravity. The authors started with concept map with four aspects of gravity (concept domains), which were used to create the initial set of test questions. The questions underwent several rounds of testing and revision, which consisted of giving the questions to students and analyzing the responses, student interviews and expert review. Appropriate statistical analysis of reliability, difficulty and discrimination were conducted and reasonable values found. A wide range of normalized gain scores were found for different courses, indicating that that NGCI is sensitive to differences in instruction. The NGCI has been used with over 900 students at six institutions and results are published in one peer-reviewed publication.

References

PhysPort provides translations of assessments as a service to our users, but does not endorse the accuracy or validity of translations. Assessments validated for one language and culture may not be valid for other languages and cultures.

Language Translator(s)  
Arabic Hisham Bani-Salameh

If you know of a translation that we don't have yet, or if you would like to translate this assessment, please contact us!

Typical Results

Typical scores on the NGCI as given in Table 2 of Williamson and Willoughby 2013:

The latest version of the NGCI, released in 2013, is version 3.