Developed by Homeyra Sadaghiani and Steven Pollock
|Purpose||To assess students’ knowledge about main topics of quantum measurement at the junior level.|
|Focus||Modern / Quantum Content knowledge (wave functions, measurement, time dependence, probability, infinite square well, 1D tunneling, energy levels)|
Sample questions from the QMCA:
The Colorado Science Education Initiative has developed a wide range of curricular materials for teaching junior-level quantum mechanics, of which the QMCA is only one. Please visit the website (http://www.colorado.edu/sei/departments/physics_3220.htm) for other materials such as group activities, clicker questions, and homework.
This is the second highest level of research validation, corresponding to at least 5 of the validation categories below.
Research Validation Summary
Based on Research Into:
- Student thinking
- Student interviews
- Expert review
- Appropriate statistical analysis
- At multiple institutions
- By multiple research groups
- Peer-reviewed publication
The multiple-choice questions on the QMCA were developed by first converting the open-ended questions on the QMAT to a multiple-choice format and creating eight new questions. To create the multiple-choice answers, open-ended responses to QMAT questions, responses in student interviews, and expert feedback were used and a literature review was conducted. This initial version of the QMCA was given to over 50 students, and 13 of these students participated in follow-up interviews. The questions were revised and given to an additional 263 students taking upper-division quantum mechanics at 10 intuitions. Appropriate statistical analysis of reliability, difficulty and discrimination were conducted and reasonable values were found. The QMCA has been tested with over 300 students and the results are published in two peer-reviewed publications.
- S. Goldhaber, S. Pollock, M. Dubson, P. Beale, and K. Perkins, Transforming Upper-Division Quantum Mechanics: Learning Goals and Assessment, presented at the Physics Education Research Conference 2009, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 2009.
- H. Sadaghiani, J. Miller, S. Pollock, and D. Rehn, Constructing a Multiple-choice Assessment for Upper-division Quantum Physics from an Open-ended Tool, presented at the Physics Education Research Conference 2013, Portland, OR, 2013.
- H. Sadaghiani and S. Pollock, Quantum mechanics concept assessment: Development and validation study, Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 11 (1), 010110 (2014).
PhysPort provides translations of assessments as a service to our users, but does not endorse the accuracy or validity of translations. Assessments validated for one language and culture may not be valid for other languages and cultures.
If you know of a translation that we don't have yet, or if you would like to translate this assessment, please contact us!
Login or register to download the answer key and an excel scoring and analysis tool for this assessment.
Typical scores on the QMCA from Sadaghiani and Pollock 2014. Below are students’ mean scores on the beta version of QMCA, organized based on the type of university. (Repeated name codes mean consecutive semesters at the same institution) N is the number of students in the class. The red dashed line represents the weighted average for all students across different institute, which was 54%.
Coming soon: The PhysPort Assessment Data Explorer
Start learning more from your tests.
- Get 1-click statistics
- Compare to students like yours
- Get practical, personalized recommendations
The latest version of the QMCA, released in Spring 2014, is version 5.5.7. This instrument was adapted from an open-ended instrument known as the Quantum Mechanics Assessment Tool (QMAT). Earlier versions of the multiple-choice version were known as the QMAT-MC, before it was renamed the QMCA.