Developed by Pasi Nieminen, Antti Savinainen, and Jouni Viiri
|Purpose||To comprehensively evaluate students’ skills in using multiple representations, specifically their ability to use different representations consistently between isomorphic questions.|
|Focus||Mechanics Content knowledge (kinematics, forces, graphing, multiple representations)|
Sample questions from the R-FCI:
This is the third highest level of research validation, corresponding to at least 3 of the validation categories below.
Research Validation Summary
Based on Research Into:
- Student thinking
- Student interviews
- Expert review
- Appropriate statistical analysis
- At multiple institutions
- By multiple research groups
- Peer-reviewed publication
The multiple-choice questions on the R-FCI are based on 9 questions from the 1995 version of the FCI. This sub-set of questions was chosen because they were the most appropriate for being transformed into different representations. For each question, three isomorphic variations were created, each having a different representation. The developers sought to keep contexts and answer choices as similar as possible to the original FCI question. The R-FCI was given to over 100 students, who also gave a written explanation for each answer, and 92% of correct answers also had correct reasoning. Appropriate statistical analyses of reliability, difficulty and discrimination were conducted and reasonable values found. The R-FCI has been given to over 400 students at one Finnish high school and results are published in 4 peer-reviewed publications.
- P. Nieminen, A. Savinainen, and J. Viiri, Force Concept Inventory-based multiple-choice test for investigating students' representational consistency, Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 6 (2), 020109 (2010).
- P. Nieminen, A. Savinainen, and J. Viiri, Relations between representational consistency, conceptual understanding of the force concept, and scientific reasoning, Phys. Rev. ST Phys. Educ. Res. 8 (1), 010123 (2012).
- P. Nieminen, A. Savinainen, and J. Viiri, Gender Differences in Learning of the Concept of Force, Representational Consistency, and Scientific Reasoning, Int. J. Sci. Math. Educ. 11 (5), 1137 (2012).
- A. Savinainen, P. Nieminen, J. Viiri, J. Korkea-aho, and A. Talikka, FCI-based Multiple Choice Test for Investigating Students' Representational Coherence, presented at the Physics Education Research Conference 2007, Greensboro, NC, 2007.
PhysPort provides translations of assessments as a service to our users, but does not endorse the accuracy or validity of translations. Assessments validated for one language and culture may not be valid for other languages and cultures.
If you know of a translation that we don't have yet, or if you would like to translate this assessment, please contact us!
Login or register to download the answer key and an excel scoring and analysis tool for this assessment.
There are three ways to calculate scores on the RFCI. Below are typical results for pre-, post-test and normalized gain from (Nieminen, Savinainen and Viiri 2010). This paper includes typical results for the other two ways of calculating RFCI scores.
Coming soon: The PhysPort Assessment Data Explorer
Start learning more from your tests.
- Get 1-click statistics
- Compare to students like yours
- Get practical, personalized recommendations
An earlier version of the test (previously called the Representation Test) was developed in 2006, consisting of 21 items concerning gravitation and Newton’s third law. The test was then improved and expanded until in 2007 the final version consisted of 27 items concerning gravitation and Newton’s first, second and third laws.
The R-FCI is based on nine items taken from the 1995 version of the FCI: items number 1, 4, 13, 17, 22, 24, 26, 28, and 30. For each of the nine FCI items, the R-FCI contains three items that are all isomorphic variants of the same question.
Intro college, High school